fucking deletionists. i know the article needs some work but this really fucks me off.

I see no 'marked for deletion' on the page itself or 'keep' on the linked page - I presume its no longer in danger. It doesn't mention ice spottles though, someone should fix that.

YOU should fix that ;)

what fucks me off the most is they didn't give a shit about it when it was a stub article, but the moment someone starts giving it some structure and making it look more like a proper wiki page, they clamour for its removal.

most of the problem is yanks don't spot (too complicated for them i guess) and they are (typically) incapable of understanding things that exist outside their borders.

the spotting article used to be excellent, with pictures and diagrams but the fucking nazis deleted it because 'it was merged with the cannabis smoking article'. on checking that article there is no mention of the technique. its as if there is some sort of organised movement that is trying to quash information regarding spotting on wikipedia.

i removed the deletion banner. i figure if those faggots can slate it for removal on a whim then i can un-slate it.

it looks like the references leb put in are keeping the nazis at bay.. for now.

unfortunately i think it's still slated for deletion, removing the template doesn't actually change that :/

but yeah, it's stupid.

This page isn't the one that was there a few years ago... the original must have been deleted. It was about four pages long and had a lot of detail.

yeah i know man! the old one was way better and they deleted it. fucking lame.

This is so typical... short-sited, narrow-minded, myopic little c*nts at wikipedia. Grrrrr. :+

It is a bit bizarre when you think that they have a detailed list of every single pokemon

Jaysweet is doing everything in his power to get it deleated. Why are non-drug users editing drug related articles.

Why are non drug users setting drug policy?